[ad_1]
New Delhi: Laws like anti-terrorism law should not be misused to suppress opposition in the society. The misuse of laws such as anti-terrorism to harass citizens and suppress protests is wrong, said Supreme Court Justice D.S. Y. Chandrachud (dy chandrachud) said. Chandrachud was speaking at the India-US Joint Summer Conference. If freedom is denied, the court should come forward to protect them, said Chandrachud.
Stan Swamy, 84, who was charged under the anti-terrorism law, died a few days ago. This sparked a heated debate in the country. Stan Swamy, 84, died in prison. He was charged under anti-terrorism laws. A bail hearing was to be held in the Mumbai High Court due to health reasons. But before that, he died in prison. A few days ago, Assam leader Akhil Gogoi was granted bail after 17 months. The Delhi High Court had last month granted bail to three student activists. The court had granted bail, saying the constitution gave it the right to protest and could not be termed as anti-terrorism action. The case is now in the Supreme Court.
Other criminal laws, including anti-terrorism laws, should not be abused to suppress protests or to harass civilians. If citizens are being deprived of their freedom, the courts should protect them. “Even if one’s freedom is taken away for a day, it is a big deal,” said Justice Chandrachud.
delhi high court: It is time to implement uniform civil law in the country: Delhi High Court
Chandrachud said he was committed to respecting human rights. The ideal of the world’s oldest and largest democracy is a multifaceted culture, diverse religions, castes and its constitution committed to respecting human rights. The Supreme Court is the highest court and citizens have the right to appeal to this court. The Supreme Court has wide powers to protect the fundamental rights of the people, said Justice Chandrachud.
Section 66a: Despite the repeal of Section 66A, it is shocking and shocking to file an offense under it
[ad_2]
Source link
