[ad_1]
Your petition is based on facts. Not just on newspaper clippings, Sharma said. Sharma also said that the objection filed by the court against the individual defendant was acceptable and that he would amend the petition.
Supreme Court: The Supreme Court asked, ‘What evidence do you have that Pegasus was spying?
Pegasus is a vicious type of technology. And that is completely illegal. Your private life is infiltrated through the phone. All your movements are picked up and closely monitored. This is an attack on one’s private life and reputation, senior advocate Kapil Sibal told the court.
Several petitions have been filed in the Pegasus espionage case. The court will decide from which petition the notice is to be sent and which is not. Petitioners should also give a copy of their petition to the government. After hearing the government’s submissions, the apex court will decide whether to issue a notice, the court said.
Article 370: 1948 people arrested under UAPA in 2019, Modi government’s information in Rajya Sabha
The Pegasus espionage case is a cause for concern. It is a kind of attack on democracy, the security of the country and the justice system. This spyware is used to monitor this. This could have a major impact on the country’s security, he said. L. Sharma has said in the petition.
[ad_2]
Source link