[ad_1]
Highlights:
- Objection to Modi’s photo on vaccination certificate.
- Petition filed in Kerala High Court for deletion of photo.
- The High Court questioned the petitioner.
Read: PM Modi bows at Kashi Vishweshwar’s feet; Said, ‘Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj ….’
Peter Maliparampil has objected to a photo of Prime Minister Modi on a covid vaccination certificate. The certificate is part of the personal document. Petitioners have filed a petition seeking the removal of the photograph, claiming that it is a violation of one’s fundamental rights if a photograph of another person is affixed to it. On this petition, today Justice P. V. During the hearing before Kunhikrishnan, he questioned the petitioner and uttered harsh words.
Read:Modi govt moves another body to Delhi
The petitioner’s lawyers had pointed out that in any country, there is no photograph of the Prime Minister and a prominent person on the vaccination certificate. Why do you feel so lacking about the Prime Minister’s photo? They have come to power with a mandate. Although there are different political ideologies here, it should be kept in mind that he is the Prime Minister of our country, ‘the court said. The Prime Minister has been elected by the people of the country. Therefore, what is wrong with having his photo on the vaccination certificate ?, the court also asked. More than 100 crore people in the country have been vaccinated against Kovid. However, no one came to the court objecting to the photo of the Prime Minister. Then the court also asked why this photo is bothering you.
The hearing lasted an hour
The petition was heard for an hour. Petitioner’s counsel Ajit Joy, meanwhile, made a number of claims. Whether the Prime Minister should be proud or not depends on the will. So no one can be forced to do that. Noting that political differences are not an issue here, Joy pointed out that a photo of the Prime Minister on a vaccination certificate could affect voters, which was discussed in the Assembly elections a few months ago. “We need to take into account the Supreme Court’s guidelines on public-funded government advertisements and campaigns,” he said. Proponents of her case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online. This petition has been filed only for discussion. Therefore, the petition should be rejected, the Center requested. The court did not rule on the petition today.
Read: Who is the new head of the country’s defense forces ?; The name of Marathmolya officer is at the forefront
[ad_2]
Source link