The Supreme Court’s order has come as a shock to the state government, which is awaiting the appointment of 12 MLAs.
What exactly is the controversy regarding the MLAs appointed by the Governor?
Under Article 173(3) of the Constitution, experts in the fields of literature, art, science, cooperative movement and social work are selected as MLAs nominated by the Governor on the Legislative Council. Accordingly, the State Cabinet took a decision on 29 October 2020 to recommend the names of 12 persons for the 12 vacant posts in June-2020 and Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray sent a letter to the Governor on 6 November 2020. However, the Governor has not yet taken a decision under Article 173(5) of the Constitution. Ratan Soli Luth had pointed out to the High Court last year that this action of the Governor is in violation of the Constitution. A bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni gave its decision on August 13, 2021 on that PIL.
“There is no time limit given in the Constitution of India for taking decisions by persons holding statutory positions. While framing the constitution with the goal of progress and upliftment of the society in mind, the architects of the constitution may not have thought that in the future, a mindset of prioritizing self-interest over public interest may also arise. To entertain such a question of time limit in such a situation is actually torturing us. It does not befit the office and the dignity of the office for a person holding a statutory office to defend his act of inaction on the ground that there is no time limit. A person holding any statutory office should work to enhance the prestige of the office by focusing on resolving issues without giving rise to differences of opinion with the aim of moving the country forward,” the bench had expressed displeasure with the behavior of Governor Bhagat Singh Koshyari. However, the bench had made it clear in its decision that it could not issue an order to the governor. Ratan appealed to the Supreme Court on October 25 last year. Since it is pending, the Supreme Court has clarified in the order that no steps should be taken regarding the appointment to those 12 posts till the next hearing.
[ad_2]
Source link