[ad_1]
The use of the sedition law is like giving a saw to a carpenter to cut wood. He uses this saw to cut down entire forests. We do not blame any state or government. However, despite the repeal of Section 66A of the IT Act, offenses are being registered under it. Unfortunately many people had to suffer. Who will be held responsible in this case? Now, it is like a police officer using Section 124-A to straighten out a person in the village, said Chief Justice Ramanna. The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a petition by a former military officer challenging the constitutional validity of the sedition law.
UP Elections: Prime Minister Modi slaps Yogi Adityanath on the back in Varanasi
The petition claims that the sedition law has a devastating effect on freedom of expression and imposes unfair restrictions on the fundamental right to speak. Former Army Officer Major General (Retd.) S. G. Ombatkere has filed the petition. Section 124-A of the Indian Penal Code relating to treason is completely unconstitutional. The petition seeks repeal of the clause.
Ravi Kishan, father of four, will explain the benefits of two children in Rajya Sabha
[ad_2]
Source link