Hearing of power struggle in Maharashtra postponed, hearing in Supreme Court on ‘this’ date?

New Delhi : The hearing on the political power struggle in Maharashtra is going on in the Supreme Court. It is reported that the August 8 hearing in the Supreme Court, on which the future of Maharashtra politics depends, has been postponed. An important hearing on the petitions from Shiv Sena and Chief Minister Eknath Shinde’s group was scheduled for August 8. However, it is now known that the next hearing will be held on August 12. Hearing on power struggle in Maharashtra Chief Justice N. V. It is being held under the chairmanship of Ramana. As the Chief Justice is going to retire on August 26, it can be decided at the next hearing whether these petitions will be decided or handed over to the Constitution Bench.

The decision will be taken after reading the written arguments of all
The hearing on the power struggle in Maharashtra was held in the Supreme Court for two consecutive days. On August 3 and 4, the Chief Justice heard arguments from both sides. Kapil Sibal, Abhishek Manu Singhvi argued for Uddhav Thackeray on behalf of Shiv Sena. So, Harish Salve from Eknath Shinde’s group, Arvind Datar from the Central Election Commission and Tushar Mehta, Advocate General, on behalf of Governor Bhagatsinh Koshyari argued. After hearing the arguments of both the sides, Chief Justice Ramana announced that the next hearing will be held on August 8. At the same time, a decision was also expected whether to refer the case to the Constitutional Court or not. Now this hearing has been postponed. The Supreme Court had also instructed the Central Election Commission not to take a major decision on that day.

India’s Ravi Dahiya won the gold medal, Indian wrestlers’ looting of medals continues

Argument made by Harish Salve for Eknath Shinde’s group

“There is no division in the Shiv Sena party, but there is a dispute about the leadership of the party. He is within the party and does not come under defection ban. Senior lawyer Harish Salve argued in the Supreme Court on behalf of the Chief Minister Eknath Shinde’s faction that if the majority of MLAs of the party, who are unhappy with the Chief Minister’s working methods, want a change of leadership, it will be opposition within the party.

Double Gold Medal… India’s Vinesh Phogat won gold medal, history made in England

Shiv Sena’s argument

Kapil Sibal, on behalf of the Uddhav group, said that the rebel faction of the Shiv Sena has violated the party order issued by the Chief Pratodar and should be disqualified on the basis of Clause 1 (b) of the Second Schedule of the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution. ‘The whip or party mandate is the umbilical cord between the political party and the legislative party. Merely claiming majority in the legislature party does not break it. As the group of rebel MLAs has not merged with any party, they have no protection under the fourth paragraph of the Tenth Schedule. Even though these MLAs were called for the Shiv Sena meeting, they first went to Surat and from there to Guwahati. He wrote to the vice president and appointed his protod. Kapil Sibal argued that he has left the membership of Shiv Sena by such conduct.

Third Gold Medal… Dhul Charat Naveen won the gold medal by Pakistan’s Sharif